After 10 humid years, I finally pulled my A99 antenna off the pole and replaced it with the MACO V 5/8 (see previous ‘Nuff Said for the review), but to recap: I was really looking forward to having an aluminum antenna again, but really disappointed with the quality of what came out of the box. In a nutshell, all of the ends of the tubing had bur’s, were rough and required sanding. In their manual they state:

 

PLEASE NOTE: In an effort to keep the price on Maco Antennas down. We have decided not to clean up all the burrs and rough edges on the parts We recommend that you deburr and clean up each part with files, sandpaper, etc. so that they go together easily. We are aware this needs to be done but have elected to save you the money we would have to add to the price of the kit for this service.

 

            This was a MAJOR issue with me – not that I couldn’t do what was needed to be done, but that it was to “save me money”. I could think of numerous Cushcraft antennas I’ve assembled, at a reasonable cost, and nary a burr to be found. Needless to say I was miffed, and it was obvious that I wouldn’t get the antenna installed in the time frame I had allotted. However, once this was done and the antenna was in place (and after several attempts I got the tuning right), I was happy.

 

            Not too long after the installation I began to hear rumors of a SUPER custom made antenna that was a bit more expensive than the Maco V5000. When I found out it was made by my good friend Jay-In-The-Mohave, my interest really peaked. You see, Jay is an antenna expert of sorts, always new ideas, or looking at different antennas, analyzing the design and taking notes on its best features with the hopes of combining them all to create….well…the “Super” antenna. His ideas became the Interceptor 10K or I-10K Omni-directional antenna.

 

            When Jay offered to send me one to test, I jumped at the chance! When the antenna arrived, and before I even took it out of the box, I could tell that this antenna was something special – that box was H-E-A-V-Y. Yes, I know, weight isn’t everything, however it indicated that Jay didn’t use lightweight, easy to bend (or ruin) aluminum like some manufacturers did. I knew that I had a quality antenna in my possession even before pulling it out of the box. I opened the box and pulled out some of the elements and suddenly realized “Hey, my fingers aren’t cut up”. Sure enough – no burrs on this mule, Jay took the time, to SAVE me the time of filing, sanding, and wrapping a finger or two with a band aid.

 

            But besides seeming heavier than the Maco V5/8 or V5000, what WERE the differences? I had to find out….

 

            My first step was to look at the Maco specifications.  I found that they used an Aluminum Alloy, 6063-T5, which meant absolutely nothing to me. I also noticed that the tubing size was .047.

 

            Step 2: Check out the Interceptor antenna specs! Jay used 6063-T832 Aluminum Alloy, with a size of .058 (the size difference explained why the tubing seemed heftier and more sturdy).

 

 

            Finally, I spent some time on the Internet “Googling” for information on 6063 and found many informative websites, of which I borrowed some of the data you see in TABLE 1. If you look at the numbers (especially “Strength” and “Ultimate Shearing Strength”) you can see that A1 Antennas chose their alloy’s very well, and at least by-the-numbers, they really beat the crap out of the Maco antenna!!

 

 

 

 

 

TABLE 1

 

Engineering Reference
Typical Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys

Alloy and Temper

Tension

 Hardness 

Ultimate Shearing Strength

Fatique

Modulus of Elasticity

Strength ksi

Elongation
% in 2in

Brinell Number

Endurance Limit

Ultimate

Yield

1/16" Thick Specimen

1/2" Diameter  Specimen 

500 kg Load
10 mm Ball

ksi

ksi

ksi x 103 

6063-T5

27

21

12

 

60

17

 

10

6063-T832

42

39

12

 

95

27

 

10

 

 

 

ASSEMBLY AND TESTING

 

Assembly went very smoothly (did I mention the lack of rough edges??) and I was almost hesitant to put it up on the roof (it looked more like a piece of modern art), but up it went and now it was time for a side-by-side test.

 

Using the same rig (Rat Shack TRC-457) I found that in my case, both antennas seemed to transmit equally within 5-10 miles, but that on longer distances (15-30miles) the Interceptor nudged ahead of the V5/8 in both transmit and receive, including a lower noise level.

 

FINAL THOUGHTS

 

“Would I purchase an Interceptor antenna?”  If I was on a tight budget – probably not. $250 is a lot of money and thus I would defer to something less expensive. If money wasn’t an issue, and I wanted the best omni-directional antenna I could possibly own, I would plunk down my money in a heartbeat. Suffice to say – This Interceptor antenna is the LAST omni-directional antenna I will ever need again, and it’s nice to see such great quality coming from a MADE-IN-THE-USA company –

 

73

Woody

 

***NOTE- We goofed on the stress point reinforced picture ( I wasn’t paying attention), but I’ll have a picture of it in the April ‘Nuff Said (Tnx Dino!)